Delhi court convicts DTC driver in fatal
A Delhi court has convicted a former DTC bus driver for the 2021 hit-and-run death of a motorcyclist, citing rash driving and a failure to brake.

A Delhi court has convicted a former Delhi Transport Corporation bus driver for a fatal 2021 hit-and-run. Judicial Magistrate Twinkle Chawla found Karan Singh guilty of rash and negligent driving leading to death under Indian Penal Code sections 279 and 304A, as reported by the Hindustan Times.
According to the prosecution, the accident occurred on DPS Marg near the NASC Complex in Inderpuri. Singh was driving a CNG-powered DTC bus during peak morning hours. The court found he was not driving in the bus's designated lane.
The Collision and Evidence
Singh rammed the bus into a two-wheeler from behind. The rider, Amit Singh, fell and was crushed under the bus's rear tyre. The impact was severe. The victim suffered a skull fracture. Tyre marks were found on his chest and neck.
The court rejected the driver's claim that his bus was not involved. Technical evidence was key. A mechanical inspection of the bus revealed dried blood on the outer tyre surface. Dried flesh and brain matter were found on the inside arch surface of the rear outer tyre.
There was no mechanical failure in the brakes. The inspection report confirmed this. The court stated the accused did not apply the brakes in time. He did not slow down.
Court's Reasoning on Rashness
The court's order, dated August 17, detailed its reasoning. It noted the inherent danger when a large vehicle does not slow down for a smaller one ahead. "Every prudent driver understands that in case the vehicle is not slowed down..." the order stated.
It emphasized the duty of a professional driver of a large vehicle like a DTC bus. Extra care is required to ensure the safety of others on the road and passengers. The court found Singh's actions clearly negligent.
"The accused did not bother to slow down the speed and failed to apply the brakes in time, resulting in the collision and thereafter, running over the victim," the court said. It concluded the act was "manifestly and indubitably fraught with rashness and negligence."
The matter has been posted for arguments on sentencing.





